How do you transform a Business Strategy to an IT implementation artefact?, part 1

Problem – How do you transform a business Strategy to an IT implementation artefact?,

Let’s quickly look at some of the challenges?

  1. Is there a connection between business strategy and the software programs?
  2. What are the key abstractions for modelling business ideas?
  3. What are the types of artefacts to capture the system models?
  4. How to map business activities with the software component definition?
  5. How easy is to transform the business models to system models?
  6. What are the various elements to model Technology models?
  7. How helpful is Zachman Framework in initiating such transformation?

In order to realize the existing gap and the transformation efforts, we need to understand the various types of models, categories, connections and dependencies among these models which form the basis of any enterprise definition. Let’s look at the steps of transformation and the existing connections.

Step 1 – Understand and define strategy & objectives. It’s critical to describe the business objective and its connection with other strategic elements such as what are the key stakeholders, key organizations’ units, important business events, schedule, information overview, etc.

Figure: 2

If we observe the Fig 2, there are several traceable connections.

a)Business objective Connections as mentioned in Fig 2.

Source Target Notes
       Business   objective Business Services Market share to increase by 3%

b)Business Service Connections as mentioned in Fig 2.

Source Target Notes
  Business Services   Business objective Yearly subscription to replace monthly
 Business Service Business HQ Client locations
Business Services Business Processes related to service  definition Understand the business processes,  activities, tasks
Business Services Important Dates Date, month
Business Services Organization structure Key actors, roles

Step 2: Transformation of Strategy services and objectives to the Business models.
This transformation consists of two-phase. In the phase one,you need to describe the various business primitive models and then in the phase 2, one needs to do the mapping and transformation from strategy elements to the business elements.

Phase I – Mapping across business primitive models

Business Process Connections as mentioned in Fig 3

Source Target Notes
Business Processes related to service  definition Business Events Important dates,  schedule
Business Processes related to service  definition Business Information Key Information, Assets, Entity
Business Processes related to service  definition Business locations Branch Locations,  Facility Locations


Business location
Connections as in Fig 3

Source Target Notes
Business locations Network & Distribution  Nodes, Servers, Storage, devices,
Client locations Business locations


Phase II – Mapping across strategy to business models


Figure: 3

If need arise, one can extend this transformation with set of extended elements for both strategy as well business models.

Step 3: Transformation of Business models to System models

Figure: 4

Data Model – logical Connections

Source Target Notes
 SW model for Business Logic  Data Model logical Data  store,Data  Flow,Elements  & Relationship
 Data Model -  logical  Technical Data Model Table , View, Procedure
 Business Information Data Model logical Data  Distribution
Business  Entity
Assumptions
Assets
Equipment  AssetsDocument  Assets

Network & Distribution Connections

Source Target Notes
Business locations Network & Distribution
SW model for Business  Logic Network & Distribution
Network & Distribution Network & distributionTechnical models  Device, Node,Storage

For the details on the transformation from system models to technology models and how does  it fits to the zachman framework, wait for the second part of this posting.

Hopefully, sometime later this week.

About sunilduttjha

Chief Architect & CEO - iCMG Sunil is practicing architect & CEO of iCMG, who is influencing enterprise decisions worth $250mn annually. In the last 11 years, he is instrumental in growing iCMG as leading full service Enterprise & IT Architecture Firm, providing architectural services to a wide variety of clients (over 20 domains) across 23 countries. Being Aerospace Engineer by qualification (IIT Kharagpur), he enjoys working with complex systems such as Air Traffic Control System, Water Leakage Management System (City/country), Shipping & Surveillance systems, of course that also include few million or few billion dollar enterprises etc. As a practising architect, he is often engaged in adoption of Enterprise & IT Architecture driven Transformation and Planning, IT Landscape Rationalization for business success. He is an excellent technologist, great visionary and one of the true thought leaders and practitioners of Eterprise & IT Architecture. One can't miss his penchant for problem solving, reasoning based on "engineering" principles and hands-on startegy-to-operation excellence in tacking issues ( small or big) related to asset consolidation, integration, efficiency, innovation,reusability and governance etc. You will agree that you need a seasoned hand to approach for a project that is enterprise-wide in scope. As an architecture coach/mentor, he has taught enterprise & software architecture classes to over 5,000 professionals (cumulative) in 16 countries. The contribution of Sunil Dutt Jha to an evolving discipline of Enterprise & IT Architecture through education & training, consulting, Annual Awards, Architect Pavilion (Architects networking site) are worth noting.

One Response to “How do you transform a Business Strategy to an IT implementation artefact?, part 1”

  1. Hi Sunil

    Thanks for a very well detailed analysis of a very common stumper question.

    I would start by working backwards – what happens when the implementation is complete – what will it look like.

    Then comes the harder task of drawing up the current picture.

    This in theory can provide the starting point of drawing up a roadmap.

    To keep this short, I have left out the level 2 of analysis:
    1) What is the current IT Growth Model within the organization?
    2) What is the change needed in the model?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 633 other followers